
The Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA) under companies act are the foundation documents upon which a company in India is built. These documents serve distinct yet complementary purposes, defining the company's core aspects and the internal rules that govern its operations. Understanding MOA and AOA is crucial for anyone involved in company formation or governance.
The Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA) under companies act are the foundation documents upon which a company in India is built. These documents serve distinct yet complementary purposes, defining the company's core aspects and the internal rules that govern its operations. Understanding MOA and AOA is crucial for anyone involved in company formation or governance.
Often referred to as the company's constitution, the MOA acts as a public document outlining the company's fundamental characteristics. As Lord Cairns famously stated, the MOA is the "charter which sets out the limitations of the company established under the Act"[1]
It's a mandatory requirement for companies registering under the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) as either a Public Limited Company or a Private Limited Company to prepare the MOA and AOA before incorporation of the entities[2].
Both MOA and AOA are one of the charter documents of the company and prepared during the incorporation process of the company. It is a constitutional document of the company which provides an outline to the nature and scope of the company and the activities that the company will carry out.
Additionally, it is mandatory for a company willing to incorporate in India to have a MOA and AOA before its registration with the Registrar of the Company (ROC). Without the MOA, a company cannot be formed legally.
Complementing the MOA, the AOA functions as the company's internal rulebook. It details the regulations governing the company's day-to-day operations and internal management. The AOA elaborates on aspects like:
In simpler terms, the MOA defines the "who" and "what" of the company, while the AOA details the "how."
Section 2 (56) defines “memorandum” means the memorandum of association of a company as originally framed or as altered from time to time in pursuance of any previous company law or of this Act;[3]
Section 4 of the Companies Act, 2013 categorically provides with the contents to be added in the MOA.[4]
The Act prescribes specific content requirements for both the MOA and AOA.
Complementing the MOA, the AOA functions as the company's internal rulebook. It details the regulations governing the company's day-to-day operations and internal management.
Section 2 (5) of the Act defines means the articles of association of a company as originally framed or as altered from time to time or applied in pursuance of any previous company law or of this Act.[5]
Section 5 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that the Articles shall contain the regulations for management of the company[6]. Content of the AOA (Table F, G, H, I & J in Schedule I of the Act):
The Act provides a model set of regulations in Table F, G, H, I & J in Schedule I as maybe applicable to such company, which companies can adopt or modify to suit their specific needs. Some of the key provisions covered in the AOA include:
While the MOA and AOA establish the company's foundation, there's a certain degree of flexibility to adapt them to changing circumstances. However, alterations must comply with the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) and relevant legal procedures.
The MOA, outlining the company's core aspects, allows for some modifications with specific approvals:
The AOA, governing internal operations, offers more flexibility for modifications:
The Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA) form the foundation of a company, outlining its purpose and internal governance rules. While companies need flexibility to adapt, the legal framework ensures they operate within authorized boundaries. This is where doctrines like Ultra Vires come into play.
The Latin term "ultra vires" translates to "beyond the powers." This doctrine is enshrined in the common law principle established in Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co Ltd v Riche (1875) LR 7 HL 653. It dictates that a company and its members must act within the authority granted by the MOA, particularly the object clause. This clause defines the company's intended business activities. Any action exceeding this scope is considered ultra vires and could be declared invalid.
There are some exceptions to the ultra vires doctrine. Actions considered reasonably necessary for conducting the company's business, even if not explicitly mentioned in the object clause, are generally permissible. Additionally, the doctrine of "indoor management" protects third parties dealing with the company in good faith. These third parties can presume the company follows its internal procedures correctly. Even if an act is technically ultra vires, it might be enforceable against the company if the third party was unaware of the transgression.
Section 6 of the Companies Act, 2013 plays a crucial role in ensuring the MOA adheres to legal principles. This section establishes the Act's provisions as overriding any conflicting clauses within the MOA. In simpler terms, if a provision in the MOA contradicts the Act, the Act's provision takes precedence.[10]
Section 245 of the Companies Act empowers stakeholders to file class action suits, potentially restraining the company from ultra vires activities. This allows collective action against unauthorized company actions.[11]
Another related doctrine is constructive notice. This principle states that anyone dealing with a company is presumed to have knowledge of its MOA and AOA, which are publicly available documents. This doctrine discourages third parties from relying on unauthorized acts of the company.[12] For instance, if a company enters into a contract for an ultra vires activity, the other party cannot claim they were unaware and enforce the contract.
As mentioned earlier, the doctrine of indoor management protects external parties dealing with a company in good faith. These third parties can presume the company's internal procedures are being followed correctly, even if an act is technically ultra vires. This doctrine promotes certainty in business transactions.[13]
By understanding these doctrines, companies can maintain a balance between adaptability and adherence to legal frameworks. The MOA and AOA act as a compass, guiding the company's direction while allowing for controlled adjustments as needed. Stakeholders also benefit from these doctrines, as they ensure companies operate within authorized boundaries, protecting their interests.